[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bowen Li closed FLINK-12966.
----------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.10.0
merged in master: b83a2531641a0e39e0e1c37a78f355eec636de79 1.9.0:
646d1a376cfb80fe923dfc0b68d355063dab2105
> finalize package name of Hive table source/sink
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-12966
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12966
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Connectors / Hive
> Affects Versions: 1.9.0
> Reporter: Bowen Li
> Assignee: Terry Wang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.9.0, 1.10.0
>
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> It's been brought by [~ykt836] and Jeff Zhang that the package name of
> `org.apache.flink.batch.connector` may not be proper.
> I think @zjuwangg named it this way because most connector packages are named
> as org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.xxx and he is just following the
> convention. However, as we are forwarding to streaming-batch unification, we
> probably don't need "streaming/batch" in the package names any more, coz,
> like file source/sink, hive source/sink can (doesn't mean we necessarily
> will) be made as streaming in the future. I'm thinking of just
> org.apache.flink.connectors.hive. What do you think?
> cc [~ykt836] [~xuefuz] [~lirui]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
