[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16909980#comment-16909980
 ] 

Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-4256:
-------------------------------------

This is in fact working for streaming as well, not only for batch. It works for 
both on the granularity of "pipelined regions".

However, with blocking "batch" shuffles, a batch job decomposes into many small 
pipelined regions, which can be individually recovered. Streaming programs only 
decompose into multiple pipelined regions when they do not have an all-to-all 
shuffle ({{keyBy()}} or {{rebalance()}}).

Anything beyond that, like more fine grained recovery of streaming jobs is not 
in the scope here, because it would need a mechanism different from Flink's 
current checkpointing mechanism.

> Fine-grained recovery
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-4256
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4256
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Stephan Ewen
>            Assignee: Stephan Ewen
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>
> When a task fails during execution, Flink currently resets the entire 
> execution graph and triggers complete re-execution from the last completed 
> checkpoint. This is more expensive than just re-executing the failed tasks.
> In many cases, more fine-grained recovery is possible.
> The full description and design is in the corresponding FLIP.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-1+%3A+Fine+Grained+Recovery+from+Task+Failures
> The detail desgin for version1 is 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_PqPLA1TJgjlqz8fqnVE3YSisYBDdFsrRX_URgRSj74/edit#



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

Reply via email to