[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16911394#comment-16911394
 ] 

Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-10333:
--------------------------------------

Quick question: Do we have an idea if the transactional store takes the same 
time to update the ZK entry, or whether it takes significantly longer?

Background: The time to set the "lastest checkpoint" in ZK is part of the time 
it takes to complete a checkpoint.
There are some thoughts about bringing the checkpointing time down on the 
TaskManager side, so it would be great if we keep in mind to have the JM side 
also fast/efficient to not become the bottleneck for fast checkpoints.

> Rethink ZooKeeper based stores (SubmittedJobGraph, MesosWorker, 
> CompletedCheckpoints)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-10333
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10333
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.3, 1.6.0, 1.7.0
>            Reporter: Till Rohrmann
>            Priority: Major
>
> While going over the ZooKeeper based stores 
> ({{ZooKeeperSubmittedJobGraphStore}}, {{ZooKeeperMesosWorkerStore}}, 
> {{ZooKeeperCompletedCheckpointStore}}) and the underlying 
> {{ZooKeeperStateHandleStore}} I noticed several inconsistencies which were 
> introduced with past incremental changes.
> * Depending whether {{ZooKeeperStateHandleStore#getAllSortedByNameAndLock}} 
> or {{ZooKeeperStateHandleStore#getAllAndLock}} is called, deserialization 
> problems will either lead to removing the Znode or not
> * {{ZooKeeperStateHandleStore}} leaves inconsistent state in case of 
> exceptions (e.g. {{#getAllAndLock}} won't release the acquired locks in case 
> of a failure)
> * {{ZooKeeperStateHandleStore}} has too many responsibilities. It would be 
> better to move {{RetrievableStateStorageHelper}} out of it for a better 
> separation of concerns
> * {{ZooKeeperSubmittedJobGraphStore}} overwrites a stored {{JobGraph}} even 
> if it is locked. This should not happen since it could leave another system 
> in an inconsistent state (imagine a changed {{JobGraph}} which restores from 
> an old checkpoint)
> * Redundant but also somewhat inconsistent put logic in the different stores
> * Shadowing of ZooKeeper specific exceptions in {{ZooKeeperStateHandleStore}} 
> which were expected to be caught in {{ZooKeeperSubmittedJobGraphStore}}
> * Getting rid of the {{SubmittedJobGraphListener}} would be helpful
> These problems made me think how reliable these components actually work. 
> Since these components are very important, I propose to refactor them.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

Reply via email to