[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14943008#comment-14943008
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2790:
---------------------------------------

Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1213#issuecomment-145450115
  
    I think TMs are only kept alive if their containers have been properly 
started. If the AM happens to die while the TM container are started up, I 
think they will be terminated as well. Another question is how did you kill the 
AM and what do you mean with "[...] restarting properly. But I think that's not 
the expected behavior"? 


> Add high availability support for Yarn
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-2790
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2790
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: JobManager, TaskManager
>            Reporter: Till Rohrmann
>             Fix For: 0.10
>
>
> Add master high availability support for Yarn. The idea is to let Yarn 
> restart a failed application master in a new container. For that, we set the 
> number of application retries to something greater than 1. 
> From version 2.4.0 onwards, it is possible to reuse already started 
> containers for the TaskManagers, thus, avoiding unnecessary restart delays.
> From version 2.6.0 onwards, it is possible to specify an interval in which 
> the number of application attempts have to be exceeded in order to fail the 
> job. This will prevent long running jobs from eventually depleting all 
> available application attempts.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to