[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16916607#comment-16916607
 ] 

Xiaogang Shi commented on FLINK-13848:
--------------------------------------

1. Yes. If the task message is already sent to the actor's mailbox, it's very 
difficult to prohibit it from being executed by the actor. Using a boolean flag 
which can be accessed by returned ScheduledFuture may be a solution, but that 
makes the cancellation very complicated.
2. Most rpc endpoints are already equipped with {{ScheduledExecutorService}} 
which can be used to achieve periodical triggering. If you take a look at the 
implementation, {{ScheduledExecutorService}} implements periodically scheduling 
by scheduling next triggering after the completion of current triggering.

> Support “scheduleAtFixedRate/scheduleAtFixedDelay” in 
> RpcEndpoint#MainThreadExecutor
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-13848
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13848
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>            Reporter: Biao Liu
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.10.0
>
>
> Currently the methods “scheduleAtFixedRate/scheduleAtFixedDelay" of 
> {{RpcEndpoint#MainThreadExecutor}} are not implemented. Because there was no 
> requirement on them before.
> Now we are planning to implement these methods to support periodic checkpoint 
> triggering.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

Reply via email to