walterddr commented on a change in pull request #9336:
[FLINK-13548][Deployment/YARN]Support priority of the Flink YARN application
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9336#discussion_r318299776
##########
File path:
flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/configuration/YarnConfigOptions.java
##########
@@ -180,6 +180,25 @@
" Flink on YARN on an environment with a restrictive
firewall, this option allows specifying a range of" +
" allowed ports.");
+ /**
+ * A non-negative integer indicating the priority for submitting a
Flink YARN application. It will only take effect
+ * if the Hadoop version >= 2.8.5 and YARN priority scheduling setting
is enabled. Larger integer corresponds with
+ * higher priority. If priority is negative or set to '-1'(default),
Flink will unset yarn priority setting and use
+ * cluster default priority.
+ *
+ * @see <a
href="https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.8.5/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/CapacityScheduler.html";>YARN
Capacity Scheduling Doc</a>
+ */
+ public static final ConfigOption<Integer> APPLICATION_PRIORITY =
+ key("yarn.application.priority")
+ .defaultValue(-1)
+ .withDescription(Description.builder()
+ .text("A non-negative integer indicating the
priority for submitting a Flink YARN application. It" +
+ " will only take effect if the Hadoop
version >= 2.8.5 and YARN priority scheduling setting is enabled." +
Review comment:
> I had tested in a non-priority queue, it took no effect. And in a priority
queue, the priority value took effect and would be restricted according to the
max-application-priority.
Hi @wzhero1 sorry I think I might've had some misunderstanding - does this
comment against 2.8.x or 2.4.x ?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
