TisonKun opened a new pull request #9726: [FLINK-14113][client] Remove class JobWithJars URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9726 ## What is the purpose of the change JobWithJars is a batch-only concept, acts as a POJO consists of Plan and {{URL}}s of libs. We can 1. inline the usage of Plan and {{URL}}s as we do in streaming case. 2. extract static methods into a utility class said ClientUtils. The main purpose here is towards no batch specific concept that doesn't bring too much good. ## Verifying this change *(Please pick either of the following options)* This change is code cleanup without any test coverage. ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts: - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no) - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with `@Public(Evolving)`: (no) - The serializers: (no) - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no) - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no) - The S3 file system connector: (no) ## Documentation - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no) - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable) @liupc you might also be interested in this pull request since it possibly conflict with your pull request #9683 . But let's say it just code location conflicts instead of logic conflicts. @kl0u I notice that you're working on getting rid of `run`s and `getOptimizedPlan`s in `ClusterClient` so this one also possibly conflict with your diff. But again, there should not be logic conflicts.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services
