[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16936784#comment-16936784
 ] 

David Anderson commented on FLINK-12576:
----------------------------------------

I just did some more careful testing, this time with

taskmanager.network.memory.buffers-per-channel:1
taskmanager.network.memory.floating-buffers-per-gate:1

which I think is as low as the buffering can go. 

Here are the various input and output metrics, running on Flink 1.9 with 2 
single-slot TMs:

 !Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 3.22.53 PM.png! 
 !Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 3.22.36 PM.png! 

Running on Flink 1.9 with a single two-slot TM looks like this:

 !Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 3.13.05 PM.png! 
 !Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 3.11.15 PM.png! 

I'll see if I can repeat the case you asked about on Flink 1.8.

> inputQueueLength metric does not work for LocalInputChannels
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-12576
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Metrics, Runtime / Network
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.4, 1.7.2, 1.8.0, 1.9.0
>            Reporter: Piotr Nowojski
>            Assignee: Aitozi
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>         Attachments: Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 3.11.15 PM.png, Screen Shot 
> 2019-09-24 at 3.13.05 PM.png, Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 3.22.36 PM.png, 
> Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 3.22.53 PM.png
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently {{inputQueueLength}} ignores LocalInputChannels 
> ({{SingleInputGate#getNumberOfQueuedBuffers}}). This can can cause mistakes 
> when looking for causes of back pressure (If task is back pressuring whole 
> Flink job, but there is a data skew and only local input channels are being 
> used).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to