[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16951763#comment-16951763
]
andrew.D.lin commented on FLINK-13856:
--------------------------------------
[~sewen] Hi Stephan！
Deleting the shared state first, and then dropping the exclusive location as a
whole. I think it's ok and won‘t cause any trouble（It was supposed to be
deleted），can you task about it？
Furthermore，most file systems support recursive deletion including S3.
> Reduce the delete file api when the checkpoint is completed
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-13856
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13856
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Runtime / Checkpointing, Runtime / State Backends
> Affects Versions: 1.8.1, 1.9.0
> Reporter: andrew.D.lin
> Assignee: andrew.D.lin
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: after.png, before.png,
> f6cc56b7-2c74-4f4b-bb6a-476d28a22096.png
>
> Original Estimate: 48h
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 47h 50m
>
> When the new checkpoint is completed, an old checkpoint will be deleted by
> calling CompletedCheckpoint.discardOnSubsume().
> When deleting old checkpoints, follow these steps:
> 1, drop the metadata
> 2, discard private state objects
> 3, discard location as a whole
> In some cases, is it possible to delete the checkpoint folder recursively by
> one call?
> As far as I know the full amount of checkpoint, it should be possible to
> delete the folder directly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
