[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14969518#comment-14969518
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2897:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user greghogan opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1290

    [FLINK-2897] [runtime] Use distinct initial indices for OutputEmitter 
round-robin

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/greghogan/flink 
2898_invert_travis_ci_build_order

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1290.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1290
    
----
commit dfb482e14535870c1599895949668e4bc252479f
Author: Greg Hogan <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-10-22T15:12:43Z

    [FLINK-2898] [build] Invert Travis CI build order

----


> Use distinct initial indices for OutputEmitter round-robin
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-2897
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2897
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Distributed Runtime
>    Affects Versions: 0.10
>            Reporter: Greg Hogan
>            Assignee: Greg Hogan
>
> Currently, when performing a round-robin partitioning each task will 
> sequentially partition starting with partition "1". This is fine in the usual 
> case where the number of partitioned objects greatly exceeds the number of 
> channels. However, in the case where the number of objects is relatively few 
> (each, perhaps, requiring a large computation or access to an external 
> system) it would be much better to begin partitioning at distinct indices 
> (the task index).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to