[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Piotr Nowojski updated FLINK-14952:
-----------------------------------
    Description: 
As [reported by a user on the user mailing 
list|http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/CoGroup-SortMerger-performance-degradation-from-1-6-4-1-9-1-td31082.html],
 combination of using {{BoundedBlockingSubpartition}} with yarn containers can 
cause yarn container to exceed memory limits.
{quote}2019-11-19 12:49:23,068 INFO org.apache.flink.yarn.YarnResourceManager - 
Closing TaskExecutor connection container_e42_1574076744505_9444_01_000004 
because: Container 
[pid=42774,containerID=container_e42_1574076744505_9444_01_000004] is running 
beyond physical memory limits. Current usage: 12.0 GB of 12 GB physical memory 
used; 13.9 GB of 25.2 GB virtual memory used. Killing container.
{quote}
This is probably happening because memory usage of mmap is not capped and not 
accounted by configured memory limits, however yarn is tracking this memory 
usage and once Flink exceeds some threshold, container is being killed.

Workaround is to overrule default value and force Flink to not user mmap, by 
setting a secret (🤫) config option:
{noformat}
taskmanager.network.bounded-blocking-subpartition-type: file
{noformat}

  was:
As [reported by a user on the user mailing 
list|http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/CoGroup-SortMerger-performance-degradation-from-1-6-4-1-9-1-td31082.html],
 combination of using {{BoundedBlockingSubpartition}} with yarn containers can 
cause yarn container to exceed memory limits. 

{noformat}
2019-11-19 12:49:23,068 INFO  org.apache.flink.yarn.YarnResourceManager         
            - Closing TaskExecutor connection 
container_e42_1574076744505_9444_01_000004 because: Container 
[pid=42774,containerID=container_e42_1574076744505_9444_01_000004] is running 
beyond physical memory limits. Current usage: 12.0 GB of 12 GB physical memory 
used; 13.9 GB of 25.2 GB virtual memory used. Killing container.
{noformat}
This is probably happening because memory usage of mmap is not capped and not 
accounted by configured memory limits, however yarn is tracking this memory 
usage and once Flink exceeds some threshold, container is being killed.


> Yarn containers can exceed physical memory limits when using 
> BoundedBlockingSubpartition.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-14952
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14952
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Deployment / YARN, Runtime / Network
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.1
>            Reporter: Piotr Nowojski
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.10.0
>
>
> As [reported by a user on the user mailing 
> list|http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/CoGroup-SortMerger-performance-degradation-from-1-6-4-1-9-1-td31082.html],
>  combination of using {{BoundedBlockingSubpartition}} with yarn containers 
> can cause yarn container to exceed memory limits.
> {quote}2019-11-19 12:49:23,068 INFO org.apache.flink.yarn.YarnResourceManager 
> - Closing TaskExecutor connection container_e42_1574076744505_9444_01_000004 
> because: Container 
> [pid=42774,containerID=container_e42_1574076744505_9444_01_000004] is running 
> beyond physical memory limits. Current usage: 12.0 GB of 12 GB physical 
> memory used; 13.9 GB of 25.2 GB virtual memory used. Killing container.
> {quote}
> This is probably happening because memory usage of mmap is not capped and not 
> accounted by configured memory limits, however yarn is tracking this memory 
> usage and once Flink exceeds some threshold, container is being killed.
> Workaround is to overrule default value and force Flink to not user mmap, by 
> setting a secret (🤫) config option:
> {noformat}
> taskmanager.network.bounded-blocking-subpartition-type: file
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to