[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16984580#comment-16984580
 ] 

Chesnay Schepler commented on FLINK-14835:
------------------------------------------

Starting from 1.10 you can use {{Configuration#set(ConfigOption<T>, T)}} in 
this way (added in FLINK-14493).

Beyond that I don't think there's anything we can do.

> Make `org.apache.flink.configuration.Configuration` support method chaining
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-14835
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14835
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Configuration
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.1
>            Reporter: Victor Wong
>            Priority: Major
>
> *Goal:*
> To make the following code examples work in production, which is very handy 
> for users to set a couple of configurations: 
> {code:java}
> // instantiate table environment
> TableEnvironment tEnv = ...tEnv.getConfig()        // access high-level 
> configuration
>   .getConfiguration()   // set low-level key-value options
>   .setString("table.exec.mini-batch.enabled", "true")  // enable mini-batch 
> optimization
>   .setString("table.exec.mini-batch.allow-latency", "5 s") // use 5 seconds 
> to buffer input records
>   .setString("table.exec.mini-batch.size", "5000"); // the maximum number of 
> records can be buffered by each aggregate operator task
> {code}
>  
> *Suggestion:*
> Currently, the return type of `setXXX` method is "void", we can make it 
> return `Configuration` itself to support method chaining.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to