[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14989275#comment-14989275
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2943:
---------------------------------------

Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1323#issuecomment-153674633
  
    Ah. Apologies. Will separate 2903 related work.
    On Nov 4, 2015 3:52 PM, "Fabian Hueske" <[email protected]> wrote:
    
    > Thanks for the PR. I will try it out.
    >
    > One general comment though. Can we please not merge several issues into a
    > single PR? The problem is that this breaks the automatic linking of PRs 
and
    > JIRA issues. In this case, FLINK-2903 will not receive any comments made 
on
    > this PR. Separate PRs for individual issues is also requested by our 
coding
    > guidelines
    > <http://flink.apache.org/contribute-code.html#coding-guidelines>.
    >
    > —
    > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
    > <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1323#issuecomment-153672870>.
    >



> Confusing Bytes/Records "read" and "write" labels in WebUI job view
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-2943
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2943
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Webfrontend
>    Affects Versions: 0.10
>            Reporter: Fabian Hueske
>              Labels: starter
>             Fix For: 0.10
>
>
> The job detail view of the WebUI shows the amount of data and records 
> received from and sent out by each individual operator. This information is 
> very valuable, if correctly interpreted. 
> However, the table headings for the corresponding columns ("Bytes read", 
> "Records read", "Bytes written", and "Records written") are confusing in my 
> opinion because they do not indicate that only incoming and outgoing data is 
> tracked and disk IO is not considered at all. 
> For example, the UI shows no "Bytes/Records read" and only "Bytes/Records 
> written" for DataSources which I find counter-intuitive.
> I propose to rename these labels to either "X received" and "X sent" or "X 
> incoming" and "X outgoing" to make clear that this information only affects 
> incoming and outgoing data.
> Opinions?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to