[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16991704#comment-16991704
]
Piotr Nowojski commented on FLINK-15103:
----------------------------------------
[~xintongsong] [~azagrebin], [~sewen] was explaining to me the whole FLIP-49,
and after the discussion we are not sure how this commit
{{4b8ed643a4d85c9440a8adbc0798b8a4bbd9520b}} changing
{{taskmanager.memory.off-heap}} could have those performance implications
visible in the benchmarks, unless something else is also not working quite as
it was supposed to. Flink-benchmarks are working using the LocalExecutor, with
already preconfigured, up and running JVM and changing the value of
{{taskmanager.memory.off-heap}} shouldn't affect this code path, right?
> Performance regression on 3.12.2019 in various benchmarks
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-15103
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15103
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Benchmarks
> Reporter: Piotr Nowojski
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.10.0
>
>
> Various benchmarks show a performance regression that happened on December
> 3rd:
> [arrayKeyBy (probably the most easily
> visible)|http://codespeed.dak8s.net:8000/timeline/#/?exe=1&ben=arrayKeyBy&env=2&revs=200&equid=off&quarts=on&extr=on]
>
> [tupleKeyBy|http://codespeed.dak8s.net:8000/timeline/#/?exe=1&ben=tupleKeyBy&env=2&revs=200&equid=off&quarts=on&extr=on]
>
> [twoInputMapSink|http://codespeed.dak8s.net:8000/timeline/#/?exe=1&ben=twoInputMapSink&env=2&revs=200&equid=off&quarts=on&extr=on]
> [globalWindow (small
> one)|http://codespeed.dak8s.net:8000/timeline/#/?exe=1&ben=globalWindow&env=2&revs=200&equid=off&quarts=on&extr=on]
> and possible others.
> Probably somewhere between those commits: -8403fd4- 2d67ee0..60b3f2f
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
