[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16997757#comment-16997757
]
Rong Rong commented on FLINK-9630:
----------------------------------
Hi All,
is this connected somehow with FLINK-8497? We are investigating some similar
issues with the PartitionDiscovery.
Also I think based on the bug report. This doesn't seem to affect Kafka 0.11
and up, yes ?
--
Rong
> Kafka09PartitionDiscoverer cause connection leak on
> TopicAuthorizationException
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-9630
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9630
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Connectors / Kafka
> Affects Versions: 1.4.2, 1.5.0
> Environment: Linux 2.6, java 8, Kafka broker 0.10.x
> Reporter: Youjun Yuan
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> when the Kafka topic got deleted, during task starting process,
> Kafka09PartitionDiscoverer will get a *TopicAuthorizationException* in
> getAllPartitionsForTopics(), and it get no chance to close the
> kafkaConsumer, hence resulting TCP connection leak (to Kafka broker).
>
> *this issue can bring down the whole Flink cluster*, because, in a default
> setup (fixedDelay with INT.MAX restart attempt), job manager will randomly
> schedule the job to any TaskManager that has free slot, and each attemp will
> cause the TaskManager to leak a TCP connection, eventually almost every
> TaskManager will run out of file handle, hence no taskmanger could make
> snapshot, or accept new job. Effectly stops the whole cluster.
>
> The leak happens when StreamTask.invoke() calls openAllOperators(), then
> FlinkKafkaConsumerBase.open() calls partitionDiscoverer.discoverPartitions(),
> when kafkaConsumer.partitionsFor(topic) in
> KafkaPartitionDiscoverer.getAllPartitionsForTopics() hit a
> *TopicAuthorizationException,* no one catches this.
> Though StreamTask.open catches Exception and invoks the dispose() method of
> each operator, which eventaully invoke FlinkKakfaConsumerBase.cancel(),
> however it does not close the kakfaConsumer in partitionDiscoverer, not even
> invoke the partitionDiscoverer.wakeup(), because the discoveryLoopThread was
> null.
>
> below is the code of FlinkKakfaConsumerBase.cancel() for your convenience
> public void cancel() {
> // set ourselves as not running;
> // this would let the main discovery loop escape as soon as possible
> running = false;
> if (discoveryLoopThread != null) {
> if (partitionDiscoverer != null)
> { // we cannot close the discoverer here, as it is error-prone to
> concurrent access; // only wakeup the discoverer, the discovery
> loop will clean itself up after it escapes
> partitionDiscoverer.wakeup(); }
> // the discovery loop may currently be sleeping in-between
> // consecutive discoveries; interrupt to shutdown faster
> discoveryLoopThread.interrupt();
> }
> // abort the fetcher, if there is one
> if (kafkaFetcher != null)
> { kafkaFetcher.cancel(); }
> }
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
