ifndef-SleePy commented on issue #10332: [FLINK-13905][checkpointing] Separate checkpoint triggering into several asynchronous stages URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/10332#issuecomment-572420903 Hi @pnowojski , > To put this into a context. Could you explain/refresh my memory what are you plans for next steps after this PR? Next step is handling the ACK/declined message of `CheckpointCoordinator`, which is described in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14971. After that, we could get back to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13848. That's the last blocker of replacing timer thread with main thread executor. If all these go well, we could do the last work of this refactoring, removing coordinator-wide lock and replacing timer thread with main thread.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services
