[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17035943#comment-17035943
]
Jark Wu commented on FLINK-16023:
---------------------------------
You can just set the mysql table's name to both the 'connector.table' and the
registered name. Then what's the problem for current design? [~phoenixjiangnan]
> jdbc connector's 'connector.table' property should be optional rather than
> required
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-16023
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16023
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Connectors / JDBC
> Reporter: Bowen Li
> Assignee: Jingsong Lee
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.11.0
>
>
> jdbc connector's 'connector.table' property should be optional rather than
> required.
> connector should assume the table name in dbms is the same as that in Flink
> when this property is not present
> The fundamental reason is that such a design didn't consider integration with
> catalogs. Once introduced catalog, the flink table's name should be just the
> 'table''s name in corresponding external system.
> cc [~ykt836]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
