[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17039990#comment-17039990
 ] 

Haibo Sun commented on FLINK-16174:
-----------------------------------

CC [~pnowojski][~roman_khachatryan]

> Add a better tryYield() method to MailboxExecutor to return the lowest 
> priority of the remaining mails
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-16174
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16174
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Task
>    Affects Versions: 1.10.0
>            Reporter: Haibo Sun
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently, we use chainIndex as the priority to create MailboxExecutor to 
> process its mails. When MailboxExecutor#tryYield  is called to process mails, 
> it will take the mails of this operator and all downstream operators in the 
> chain. But sometimes, after calling MailboxExecutor#tryYield, we need to know 
> whether there is any mail of the current operator in the mailbox, which can 
> simplify some operations. 
> For example, when we close a operator in runtime, after quiescing the 
> processing time service and waiting for its running timers to finish, if 
> there is no mail of the current operator in the mailbox,  we call 
> StreamOperator#close to close the operator. Then the runtime code of closing 
> a operator can be simplified as follows.
> {code:java}
>               quiesceProcessingTimeService().get();
>               while (mailboxExecuto.betterTryYield() <= self.priority) {}
>               closeOperator(actionExecutor);
> {code}
> With the existing #tryYield method, if the following simplified code is used 
> to close a operator, then when a downstream operator is implemented like 
> MailboxOperatorTest.ReplicatingMail, the tryyield() loop will 
>  be prevented from exiting, which results deadlock.
> {code:java}
>               quiesceProcessingTimeService().get();
>               while (mailboxExecuto.tryYield()) {}
>               closeOperator(actionExecutor);
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to