[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17046083#comment-17046083
]
Jingsong Lee commented on FLINK-16296:
--------------------------------------
Thanks [~jark] for reporting. It do needs some work more complicated than
{{BinaryRowWriter}}, And it needs some performance benchmark.
> Improve performance of BaseRowSerializer#serialize() for GenericRow
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-16296
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16296
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Table SQL / Runtime
> Reporter: Jark Wu
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently, when serialize a {{GenericRow}} using
> {{BaseRowSerializer#serialize()}} , there will be 2 memory copy. The first is
> GenericRow -> BinaryRow, the second is BinaryRow -> DataOutputView.
> However, in theory, we can serialize GenericRow into DataOutputView directly,
> because we already get all the column values and types. We can serialize the
> null bit part for all columns and then the fix-part for all columns and then
> the variable lenght part.
> For example, when the column is a BinaryString, we can serialize the pos and
> length, and calcute the new variable part length, and then serialize the next
> column. If there is a generic type in the row, then it will fallback into
> previous way. But generic type in SQL is rare.
> This is a general improvements and can be benefit for every operators.
> If this can be done, then {{GenericRow}} is always the best choice for
> producers, and {{BinaryRow}} is always the best choice for consumers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
