Github user mjsax commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/750#discussion_r46283446
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/executiongraph/ExecutionVertexStopTest.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph;
    +
    +import org.apache.flink.api.common.JobID;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.akka.AkkaUtils;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.execution.ExecutionState;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.instance.ActorGateway;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.instance.BaseTestingActorGateway;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.instance.Instance;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.instance.SimpleSlot;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.JobVertexID;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.messages.Messages;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.messages.TaskMessages;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.messages.TaskMessages.TaskOperationResult;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.testingUtils.TestingUtils;
    +import org.junit.AfterClass;
    +import org.junit.Test;
    +import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
    +import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;
    +import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner;
    +
    +import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
    +import akka.testkit.JavaTestKit;
    +import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext;
    +import static 
org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionGraphTestUtils.setVertexState;
    +import static 
org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionGraphTestUtils.getExecutionVertex;
    +import static 
org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionGraphTestUtils.getInstance;
    +import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
    +import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
    +import static org.junit.Assert.fail;
    +import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock;
    +import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;
    +import static org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.whenNew;
    +
    +@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
    +@PrepareForTest(ExecutionVertex.class)
    +public class ExecutionVertexStopTest {
    +
    +   @Test
    +   public void testStop() throws Exception {
    --- End diff --
    
    Yes. The call must be "forwarded". The idea is to test if the signal is 
correctly propagated through the whole stack... (same argument as above -- 
rather a test more than less -- but I admit, that I am very [maybe too strict] 
about testing -- to me, EVERYTHING should get tested)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to