[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15042781#comment-15042781
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3093:
---------------------------------------
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1427#discussion_r46756747
--- Diff: flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/types/Pair.java ---
@@ -33,6 +34,7 @@
* @param <U> Type of the pair's first element.
* @param <V> Type of the pair's second element.
*/
+@PublicInterface
public abstract class Pair<U extends Key<U>, V extends Key<V>> implements
Key<Pair<U, V>> {
--- End diff --
Most likely, yes. I've asked Stephan in the JIRA just to make sure.
> Introduce annotations for interface stability
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-3093
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3093
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Build System
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Robert Metzger
> Assignee: Robert Metzger
> Priority: Blocker
>
> For the upcoming 1.0 release, we want to mark interfaces as public/stable so
> that we can automatically ensure that newer Flink releases (1.1, 1.2, ..) are
> not breaking them.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
