[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Till Rohrmann closed FLINK-9741.
--------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Do

Closing for inactivity. It can be revisited once we actually pull the 
{{JobMaster}} and {{Dispatcher}} apart.

> Register JVM metrics for each JM separately
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-9741
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9741
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination, Runtime / Metrics
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0, 1.6.0
>            Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
>            Assignee: Biao Liu
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently, the {{Dispatcher}} contains a {{JobManagerMetricGroup}} on which 
> the JVM metrics are registered. the JobManagers only receive a 
> {{JobManagerJobMetricGroup}} and don't register the JVM metrics.
> As the dispatcher and jobmanagers currently run in the same jvm, neither 
> exposing their IDs to the metric system, this doesn't cause problem _right 
> now_ as we can't differentiate between them anyway, but it will bite us down 
> the line if either of the above assumptions is broken.
> For example, with the proposed exposure of JM/Dispatcher IDs in FLINK-9543 we 
> would not expose JVM metrics tied to a JM, but only the Dispatcher.
> I propose to register all JVM metrics for each jobmanager separately to 
> future proof the whole thing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to