[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15046702#comment-15046702
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2976:
---------------------------------------

Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1434#discussion_r46936527
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManager.scala
 ---
    @@ -495,6 +513,76 @@ class JobManager(
         case checkpointMessage : AbstractCheckpointMessage =>
           handleCheckpointMessage(checkpointMessage)
     
    +    case TriggerSavepoint(jobId) =>
    +      currentJobs.get(jobId) match {
    +        case Some((graph, _)) =>
    +          val savepointCoordinator = graph.getSavepointCoordinator()
    +
    +          if (savepointCoordinator != null) {
    +            // Immutable copy for the future
    +            val senderRef = sender()
    +
    +            future {
    +              try {
    +                // Do this async, because checkpoint coordinator 
operations can
    +                // contain blocking calls to the state backend or 
ZooKeeper.
    +                val savepointFuture = 
savepointCoordinator.triggerSavepoint(
    +                  System.currentTimeMillis())
    +
    +                savepointFuture.onComplete {
    +                  // Success, respond with the savepoint path
    +                  case scala.util.Success(savepointPath) =>
    +                    senderRef ! TriggerSavepointSuccess(jobId, 
savepointPath)
    +
    +                  // Failure, respond with the cause
    +                  case scala.util.Failure(t) =>
    +                    senderRef ! TriggerSavepointFailure(jobId,
    +                      new Exception("Failed to complete savepoint", t))
    +                }(context.dispatcher)
    +              }
    +              catch {
    +                case e: Exception =>
    +                  senderRef ! TriggerSavepointFailure(jobId, new Exception(
    +                    "Failed to trigger savepoint", e))
    +              }
    +            }(context.dispatcher)
    +          }
    +          else {
    +            sender() ! TriggerSavepointFailure(jobId, new 
IllegalStateException(
    +              "Checkpointing disabled. You can enable it via the execution 
environment of " +
    --- End diff --
    
    This is also breaking the argument list.


> Save and load checkpoints manually
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-2976
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2976
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Distributed Runtime
>    Affects Versions: 0.10.0
>            Reporter: Ufuk Celebi
>             Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> Currently, all checkpointed state is bound to a job. After the job finishes 
> all state is lost. In case of an HA cluster, jobs can live longer than the 
> cluster, but they still suffer from the same issue when they finish.
> Multiple users have requested the feature to manually save a checkpoint in 
> order to resume from it at a later point. This is especially important for 
> production environments. As an example, consider upgrading your existing 
> production Flink program. Currently, you loose all the state of your program. 
> With the proposed mechanism, it will be possible to save a checkpoint, stop 
> and update your program, and then continue your program with the  checkpoint.
> The required operations can be simple:
> saveCheckpoint(JobID) => checkpointID: long
> loadCheckpoint(JobID, long) => void
> For the initial version, I would apply the following restriction:
> - The topology needs to stay the same (JobGraph parallelism, etc.)
> A user can configure this behaviour via the environment like the 
> checkpointing interval. Furthermore, the user can trigger the save operation 
> via the command line at arbitrary times and load a checkpoint when submitting 
> a job, e.g.
> bin/flink checkpoint <JobID> => checkpointID: long 
> and
> bin/flink run --loadCheckpoint JobID [latest saved checkpoint]
> bin/flink run --loadCheckpoint (JobID,long) [specific saved checkpoint]
> As far as I can tell, the required mechanisms are similar to the ones 
> implemented for JobManager high availability. We need to make sure to persist 
> the CompletedCheckpoint instances as a pointer to the checkpoint state and to 
> *not* remove saved checkpoint state.
> On the client side, we need to give the job and its vertices the same IDs to 
> allow mapping the checkpoint state.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to