StephanEwen commented on a change in pull request #88: Licensing final fixes / 
touches for 2.0.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/88#discussion_r401415756
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
statefun-examples/statefun-ridesharing-example/statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/LICENSE.javax.annotation-api
 ##########
 @@ -360,400 +360,3 @@ litigation relating to this License shall be subject to 
the jurisdiction
 of the Federal Courts of the Northern District of California and the
 state courts of the State of California, with venue lying in Santa Clara
 County, California.
-
 
 Review comment:
   Hmmm, interesting point. My point came from other dual-licensed projects 
(like Jackson was in the past) that included two license files (ASLv2, LGPL) 
and you forwarded the one you selected. I was thinking to mirror that here, but 
I don't know if the assumption here is that you have to forward the information 
about being dual licensed.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to