[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15060278#comment-15060278
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3093:
---------------------------------------

Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1427#issuecomment-165171199
  
    Hi,
    
    I had a look and have some comments as well
    
    - `ExecutionConfig`: Do we want to make the whole class public? Are we sure 
that we do not change the configuration of certain streaming features such as 
`enableTimestamps()`, `disableTimestamps()`, `setAutoWatermarkInterval()`? I 
find these options in combination with `TimeCharacteristics` very confusing and 
I'm not sure if we should mark them already stable. I talked to @aljoscha and 
he's not satisfied with the current implementation as well.
    - `ExecutionMode`: IMO, the name is quite generic for it's purpose. The 
mode is is only relevant for network shuffles in the batch programs.
    - `JobExecutionResult.getIntCounterResult()`: Do we need and want to keep 
this method? IMO, it should be rather deprecated than marked as stable. 
    - `Partitioner`: Does it make sense to extend the `partition(K key, int 
numPartition)` method by a paramter for the current partitionId? I remember I 
had some use cases for this, but forgot about the details.
    
    We need to carefully check the class hierarchy of public/stable classes. 
For example, if we make `DefaultInputSplitAssigner` a `Public` interface, we 
don't need to make `InputSplitAssigner` `Experimental` because we cannot touch 
it then. There might be more of these cases in this PR (and PR #1428). 


> Introduce annotations for interface stability
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-3093
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3093
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Build System
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Robert Metzger
>            Assignee: Robert Metzger
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> For the upcoming 1.0 release, we want to mark interfaces as public/stable so 
> that we can automatically ensure that newer Flink releases (1.1, 1.2, ..) are 
> not breaking them.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to