tillrohrmann commented on a change in pull request #11323: [FLINK-16439][k8s] 
Make KubernetesResourceManager starts workers using WorkerResourceSpec 
requested by SlotManager
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/11323#discussion_r409382206
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-kubernetes/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/KubernetesResourceManager.java
 ##########
 @@ -237,57 +230,73 @@ private void recoverWorkerNodesFromPreviousAttempts() 
throws ResourceManagerExce
                        ++currentMaxAttemptId);
        }
 
-       private void requestKubernetesPod() {
-               numPendingPodRequests++;
+       private void requestKubernetesPod(WorkerResourceSpec 
workerResourceSpec) {
+               final KubernetesTaskManagerParameters parameters =
+                       
createKubernetesTaskManagerParameters(workerResourceSpec);
+
+               final KubernetesPod taskManagerPod =
+                       
KubernetesTaskManagerFactory.createTaskManagerComponent(parameters);
+               kubeClient.createTaskManagerPod(taskManagerPod);
+
+               podWorkerResources.put(parameters.getPodName(), 
workerResourceSpec);
+               final int pendingWorkerNum = 
notifyNewWorkerRequested(workerResourceSpec);
 
                log.info("Requesting new TaskManager pod with <{},{}>. Number 
pending requests {}.",
-                       defaultMemoryMB,
-                       defaultCpus,
-                       numPendingPodRequests);
+                       parameters.getTaskManagerMemoryMB(),
+                       parameters.getTaskManagerCPU(),
+                       pendingWorkerNum);
+               log.info("TaskManager {} will be started with {}.", 
parameters.getPodName(), workerResourceSpec);
+       }
+
+       private KubernetesTaskManagerParameters 
createKubernetesTaskManagerParameters(WorkerResourceSpec workerResourceSpec) {
+               final TaskExecutorProcessSpec taskExecutorProcessSpec =
 
 Review comment:
   this variable hides `ActiveResourceManager.taskExecutorProcessSpec`. This 
can lead to subtle bugs. Hence, I would suggest to rename this field into 
something like `defaultTaskExecutorProcessSpec`.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to