[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Piotr Nowojski updated FLINK-17351:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.11.0
> CheckpointCoordinator and CheckpointFailureManager ignores checkpoint timeouts
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-17351
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17351
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Runtime / Checkpointing
> Affects Versions: 1.9.2, 1.10.0
> Reporter: Piotr Nowojski
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.11.0
>
>
> As described in point 2:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17327?focusedCommentId=17090576&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17090576
> (copy of description from above linked comment):
> The logic in how {{CheckpointCoordinator}} handles checkpoint timeouts is
> broken. In your [~qinjunjerry] examples, your job should have failed after
> first checkpoint failure, but checkpoints were time outing on
> CheckpointCoordinator after 5 seconds, before {{FlinkKafkaProducer}} was
> detecting Kafka failure after 2 minutes. Those timeouts were not checked
> against {{setTolerableCheckpointFailureNumber(...)}} limit, so the job was
> keep going with many timed out checkpoints. Now funny thing happens:
> FlinkKafkaProducer detects Kafka failure. Funny thing is that it depends
> where the failure was detected:
> a) on processing record? no problem, job will failover immediately once
> failure is detected (in this example after 2 minutes)
> b) on checkpoint? heh, the failure is reported to {{CheckpointCoordinator}}
> *and gets ignored, as PendingCheckpoint has already been discarded 2 minutes
> ago* :) So theoretically the checkpoints can keep failing forever and the job
> will not restart automatically, unless something else fails.
> Even more funny things can happen if we mix FLINK-17350 . or b) with
> intermittent external system failure. Sink reports an exception, transaction
> was lost/aborted, Sink is in failed state, but if there will be a happy
> coincidence that it manages to accept further records, this exception can be
> lost and all of the records in those failed checkpoints will be lost forever
> as well. In all of the examples that [~qinjunjerry] posted it hasn't
> happened. {{FlinkKafkaProducer}} was not able to recover after the initial
> failure and it was keep throwing exceptions until the job finally failed (but
> much later then it should have). And that's not guaranteed anywhere.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
