[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17110805#comment-17110805
 ] 

Echo Lee edited comment on FLINK-17745 at 5/19/20, 3:08 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------

[~kkl0u] I don't think nested jar should be removed, because in standalone 
mode, we need it. It can extracted dependent jar and upload to the blob server 
and each task can be access it. If the nested jar is removed, I'm not sure 
whether it works.


was (Author: leeecho):
[~kkl0u] I don't think nested jar should be removed, because in standalone 
mode, we need it. It can extracted dependent jar and upload to the blob file 
and each task can be access it. If the nested jar is removed, I'm not sure 
whether it works.

> PackagedProgram' extractedTempLibraries and jarfiles may be duplicate
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-17745
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17745
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Client / Job Submission
>    Affects Versions: 1.11.0
>            Reporter: lisen
>            Assignee: Kostas Kloudas
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.11.0
>
>
> When i submit a flink app with a fat jar, PackagedProgram will extracted temp 
> libraries by the fat jar, and add to pipeline.jars, and the pipeline.jars 
> contains  fat jar and temp libraries. I don't think we should add fat jar to 
> the pipeline.jars if extractedTempLibraries is not empty.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to