azagrebin commented on a change in pull request #12375: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/12375#discussion_r435231056
########## File path: flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmaster/slotpool/BulkSlotProviderImpl.java ########## @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + +package org.apache.flink.runtime.jobmaster.slotpool; + +import org.apache.flink.annotation.VisibleForTesting; +import org.apache.flink.api.common.time.Time; +import org.apache.flink.runtime.clusterframework.types.AllocationID; +import org.apache.flink.runtime.clusterframework.types.ResourceProfile; +import org.apache.flink.runtime.clusterframework.types.SlotProfile; +import org.apache.flink.runtime.concurrent.ComponentMainThreadExecutor; +import org.apache.flink.runtime.concurrent.FutureUtils; +import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobmaster.SlotInfo; +import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobmaster.SlotRequestId; +import org.apache.flink.util.clock.Clock; +import org.apache.flink.util.clock.SystemClock; + +import org.slf4j.Logger; +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; + +import java.util.ArrayList; +import java.util.Collection; +import java.util.HashSet; +import java.util.List; +import java.util.Optional; +import java.util.Set; +import java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture; +import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException; +import java.util.stream.Collectors; +import java.util.stream.Stream; + +import static org.apache.flink.util.Preconditions.checkNotNull; + +/** + * Default implementation of {@link BulkSlotProvider}. + */ +class BulkSlotProviderImpl implements BulkSlotProvider { + + private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(BulkSlotProviderImpl.class); + + private ComponentMainThreadExecutor componentMainThreadExecutor; + + private final SlotSelectionStrategy slotSelectionStrategy; + + private final SlotPool slotPool; + + private final Clock clock; + + private final PhysicalSlotRequestBulkTracker slotRequestBulkTracker; + + BulkSlotProviderImpl(final SlotSelectionStrategy slotSelectionStrategy, final SlotPool slotPool) { Review comment: it is fine. Generally, I think we could keep the constructors for pure field assignments of actual dependencies (injections) to simplify mocking dependencies in tests. I mean having no logic in constructors. If some construction logic is required, I think it is more readable to use factory methods which names reflect what they do as constructor cannot have a more descriptive name. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
