[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Zhijiang closed FLINK-13754.
----------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

> Decouple OperatorChain with StreamStatusMaintainer
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-13754
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13754
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Runtime / Task
>            Reporter: Zhijiang
>            Assignee: Zhijiang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The current OperatorChain is heavy-weight to take some unrelated roles like 
> _StreamStatusMaintainer_. If other components rely on the 
> _StreamStatusMaintainer_, we have to pass the whole OperatorChain. From the 
> design aspect of single function, we need to decouple 
> _StreamStatusMaintainer_ from _OperatorChain_.
> Based on FLINK-13798 to break the cycle dependency between 
> _RecordWriterOutput_ and _StreamStatusMaintainer,_ it is reasonable to 
> create/maintain a separate instance of _StreamStatusMaintainer_ on StreamTask 
> side.
> One reason is that it gets benefits of removing some duplicate logics while 
> creating _RecordWriter_ and _RecordWriterOutput_ together.
> Another reason is that it is easy to reference the _StreamStatusMaintainer_ 
> via _StreamTask_ in the following refactoring work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to