[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated FLINK-18462:
-----------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Improve the exception message when INSERT INTO mismatch types for empty char
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-18462
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18462
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Table SQL / Planner
>            Reporter: Jark Wu
>            Assignee: Jark Wu
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> {code:java}
> CREATE TABLE my_sink (
>   name STRING,
>   email STRING,
>   message_offset BIGINT
> ) WITH (
>   'connector' = 'values'
> );
> INSERT INTO my_sink SELECT a, '', '' FROM MyTable;
> {code}
> For the above SQL, currently, the planner will throw the following exception:
> {code}
> org.apache.flink.table.api.TableException: Zero-length character strings have 
> no serializable string representation.
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.types.logical.CharType.asSerializableString(CharType.java:117)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.sinks.TableSinkUtils$$anonfun$2.apply(TableSinkUtils.scala:92)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.sinks.TableSinkUtils$$anonfun$2.apply(TableSinkUtils.scala:92)
>       at 
> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
>       at 
> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
>       at scala.collection.Iterator$class.foreach(Iterator.scala:891)
>       at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1334)
>       at scala.collection.IterableLike$class.foreach(IterableLike.scala:72)
>       at scala.collection.AbstractIterable.foreach(Iterable.scala:54)
>       at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:234)
>       at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.map(Traversable.scala:104)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.sinks.TableSinkUtils$.validateSchemaAndApplyImplicitCast(TableSinkUtils.scala:92)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.delegation.PlannerBase$$anonfun$2.apply(PlannerBase.scala:244)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.delegation.PlannerBase$$anonfun$2.apply(PlannerBase.scala:219)
>       at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:146)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.delegation.PlannerBase.translateToRel(PlannerBase.scala:219)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.utils.TableTestUtil$$anonfun$6.apply(TableTestBase.scala:620)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.utils.TableTestUtil$$anonfun$6.apply(TableTestBase.scala:620)
>       at 
> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
>       at 
> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
>       at scala.collection.Iterator$class.foreach(Iterator.scala:891)
>       at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1334)
>       at scala.collection.IterableLike$class.foreach(IterableLike.scala:72)
>       at scala.collection.AbstractIterable.foreach(Iterable.scala:54)
>       at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:234)
>       at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.map(Traversable.scala:104)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.utils.TableTestUtil.doVerifyPlan(TableTestBase.scala:620)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.utils.TableTestUtil.doVerifyPlanInsert(TableTestBase.scala:610)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.utils.TableTestUtil.verifyPlanInsert(TableTestBase.scala:584)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.plan.stream.sql.TableSinkTest.testInsertMismatchTypeForEmptyChar(TableSinkTest.scala:53)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>       at 
> org.junit.rules.ExpectedException$ExpectedExceptionStatement.evaluate(ExpectedException.java:239)
>       at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
>       at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:48)
>       at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
>       at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
>       at 
> com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68)
>       at 
> com.intellij.rt.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:33)
>       at 
> com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:230)
>       at com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:58)
> {code}
> That's because we are using {{LogicalType#asSerializableString}} for the 
> exception message when query sink schema mismatch. However, 
> {{asSerializableString}} doesn't work for some speical types. We should use 
> {{asSummaryString}} for logging. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to