[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Xintong Song closed FLINK-19068.
--------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

Fixed via
* master: 4b6d0e62cba16e4f43866e68f72bcc3a54337d85

> Filter verbose pod events for KubernetesResourceManagerDriver
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-19068
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19068
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Deployment / Kubernetes
>            Reporter: Xintong Song
>            Assignee: Xintong Song
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> A status of a Kubernetes pod consists of many detailed fields. Currently, 
> Flink receives pod {{MODIFIED}} events from theĀ {{KubernetesPodsWatcher}} on 
> every single change to these fields, many of which Flink does not care.
> The verbose events will not affect the functionality of Flink, but will 
> pollute the logs with repeated messages, because Flink only looks into the 
> fields it interested in and those fields are identical.
> E.g., when a task manager is stopped due to idle timeout, Flink receives 3 
> events:
> * MODIFIED: container terminated
> * MODIFIED: {{deletionGracePeriodSeconds}} changes from 30 to 0, which is a 
> Kubernetes internal status change after containers are gracefully terminated
> * DELETED: Flink removes metadata of the terminated pod
> Among the 3 messages, Flink is only interested in the 1st MODIFIED message, 
> but will try to process all of them because the container status is 
> terminated.
> I propose to Filter the verbose events in 
> {{KubernetesResourceManagerDriver.PodCallbackHandlerImpl}}, to only process 
> the status changes interested by Flink. This probably requires recording the 
> status of all living pods, to compare with the incoming events for detecting 
> status changes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to