dawidwys commented on a change in pull request #13763:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13763#discussion_r513252724



##########
File path: 
flink-formats/flink-avro/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/formats/avro/typeutils/AvroSchemaConverter.java
##########
@@ -297,17 +299,22 @@ private static DataType convertToDataType(Schema schema) {
         * @return Avro's {@link Schema} matching this logical type.
         */
        public static Schema convertToSchema(LogicalType logicalType) {
-               return convertToSchema(logicalType, "record");
+               return convertToSchema(logicalType, "record", true);
        }
 
        /**
         * Converts Flink SQL {@link LogicalType} (can be nested) into an Avro 
schema.
         *
         * @param logicalType logical type
         * @param rowName     the record name
+        * @param top         whether it is parsing the root record,
+        *                    if it is, the logical type nullability would be 
ignored
         * @return Avro's {@link Schema} matching this logical type.
         */
-       public static Schema convertToSchema(LogicalType logicalType, String 
rowName) {
+       public static Schema convertToSchema(
+                       LogicalType logicalType,
+                       String rowName,
+                       boolean top) {

Review comment:
       > It is not true, a row (null, null) is nullable true. And i don't think 
it makes sense to change the planner behavior in general in order to fix a 
specific use case.
   
   Excuse me, but I wholeheartedly disagree with your statement. null =/= 
(null, null). (null, null) is still `NOT NULL`. A whole row in a Table can not 
be null. Only particular columns can be null. Therefore the top level row of a 
Table is always `NOT NULL`.
   
   I am not suggesting changing planner behaviour for a particular use case. 
The planner should always produce `NOT NULL` type for a top level row of a 
Table. If it doesn't, it is a bug.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to