[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17225982#comment-17225982
]
Chesnay Schepler commented on FLINK-17295:
------------------------------------------
It seems like the JobID is mostly useful for easily figuring out that 2
executions belong to different jobs. What if the ExecutionGraph itself were to
had an ID, which we use instead of the JobID? Then all executions for a job
attempt have the same random part, but they still differ after JM failovers.
> Refactor the ExecutionAttemptID to consist of ExecutionVertexID and
> attemptNumber
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-17295
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17295
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Runtime / Coordination
> Reporter: Yangze Guo
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>
> Make the ExecutionAttemptID being composed of (ExecutionVertexID,
> attemptNumber).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
