[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17259483#comment-17259483
 ] 

Robert Metzger commented on FLINK-17441:
----------------------------------------

https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build/results?buildId=11642&view=logs&j=d44f43ce-542c-597d-bf94-b0718c71e5e8&t=03dca39c-73e8-5aaf-601d-328ae5c35f20

> FlinkKinesisConsumerTest.testPeriodicWatermark: watermark count expected:<2> 
> but was:<1>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-17441
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17441
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Connectors / Kinesis, Tests
>    Affects Versions: 1.11.0
>            Reporter: Robert Metzger
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: test-stability
>
> CI: 
> https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build/results?buildId=378&view=logs&j=d44f43ce-542c-597d-bf94-b0718c71e5e8&t=34f486e1-e1e4-5dd2-9c06-bfdd9b9c74a8
> {code}
> 2020-04-28T15:21:59.2649685Z [WARNING] Tests run: 20, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, 
> Skipped: 5, Time elapsed: 3.571 s - in 
> org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.kinesis.FlinkKinesisConsumerMigrationTest
> 2020-04-28T15:21:59.2651709Z [INFO] Running 
> org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.kinesis.util.JobManagerWatermarkTrackerTest
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4830928Z [ERROR] Tests run: 11, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, 
> Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5.099 s <<< FAILURE! - in 
> org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.kinesis.FlinkKinesisConsumerTest
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4834381Z [ERROR] 
> testPeriodicWatermark(org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.kinesis.FlinkKinesisConsumerTest)
>   Time elapsed: 0.656 s  <<< FAILURE!
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4835968Z java.lang.AssertionError: watermark count 
> expected:<2> but was:<1>
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4836963Z  at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4837630Z  at 
> org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4838380Z  at 
> org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4839354Z  at 
> org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.kinesis.FlinkKinesisConsumerTest.testPeriodicWatermark(FlinkKinesisConsumerTest.java:831)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4840250Z  at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4841251Z  at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4842068Z  at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4842832Z  at 
> java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4843514Z  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:68)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4844993Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:326)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4846150Z  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:89)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4847091Z  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:97)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4848348Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:310)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4849866Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTestInSuper(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:131)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4851342Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.access$100(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:59)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4852889Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner$TestExecutorStatement.evaluate(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:147)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4854336Z  at 
> org.junit.rules.ExpectedException$ExpectedExceptionStatement.evaluate(ExpectedException.java:239)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4855218Z  at 
> org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4856397Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.evaluateStatement(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:107)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4857905Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:82)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4859474Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:298)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4860702Z  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:87)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4861597Z  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:50)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4862618Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.invokeTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:218)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4863985Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.runMethods(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:160)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4865210Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$1.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:134)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4866191Z  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:34)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4867064Z  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:44)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4868247Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:136)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4869398Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.run(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:117)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4870538Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.run(AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.java:57)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4871685Z  at 
> org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner.run(PowerMockRunner.java:59)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4872560Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4873627Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:273)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4874800Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4875681Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4876647Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:384)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4877639Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:345)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4878517Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:126)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4879323Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:418)
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4879790Z 
> 2020-04-28T15:22:03.4880265Z [INFO] Running 
> org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.kinesis.util.KinesisConfigUtilTest
> 2020-04-28T15:22:09.5436949Z [INFO] Results:
> 2020-04-28T15:22:09.5440816Z [INFO] 
> 2020-04-28T15:22:09.5441130Z [ERROR] Failures: 
> 2020-04-28T15:22:09.5441748Z [ERROR]   
> FlinkKinesisConsumerTest.testPeriodicWatermark:831 watermark count 
> expected:<2> but was:<1>
> 2020-04-28T15:22:09.5442764Z [INFO] 
> 2020-04-28T15:22:09.5443252Z [ERROR] Tests run: 113, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, 
> Skipped: 5
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to