wangyang0918 commented on pull request #14692: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14692#issuecomment-762848713
@tillrohrmann I have the same concern before implement this PR. But now I think this change makes sense since Flink client will not retrieve the result in the application mode. BTW the per-job mode is not supported for native K8s integration and we do not have a plan to support per-job mode. The benefit of not resolving the rest endpoint address is we could deploy the Flink session/application cluster with `ClusterIP` out of the K8s cluster. The limitation is that `flink list/cancel` could not be used to contact with the cluster. It will fail with `TimeoutException` instead of `UnknownHostException `. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
