[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
godfrey he updated FLINK-20435:
-------------------------------
Summary: Refactor ExecNode and ExecEdge (was: Refactor ExecNode)
> Refactor ExecNode and ExecEdge
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-20435
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20435
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Table SQL / Planner
> Reporter: godfrey he
> Assignee: godfrey he
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently, there are many improvements about ExecNode:
> 1. simplify type parameter of {{ExecNode}}. Currently,
> {{ExecNode#translateToPlan}} takes {{BatchPlanner}} or {{StreamPlanner}} as a
> parameter, so {{ExecNode}} has a type parameter {{E <: Planner}}, which
> indicates the node is a batch node or a streaming node. While in the future,
> a plan may contain both batch nodes and stream node. The type parameter can
> be removed, and we will use PlannerBase instead.
> 2. port the implementation of ExecNodes to Java
> 3. separate the implementation of {{FlinkPhysicalRel}} and {{ExecNode}}.
> Currently, an execution node extends both from {{FlinkPhysicalRel}} and
> {{ExecNode}}. After a physical node is converted to an exec node, many
> parameters are unnecessary, such as: RelOptCluster, RelTraitSet, etc. With
> more optimizations on {{ExecNode}}, We need {{ExecNode}} to be cleaner and
> simpler. So we will separate the implementation of {{FlinkPhysicalRel}} and
> {{ExecNode}}.
> This is an umbrella issue, we will create more related sub-tasks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
