[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Robert Metzger closed FLINK-12887.
----------------------------------
    Resolution: Invalid

Closing this ticket, as it is not about Flink, but a fork of Flink, and there 
was no more activity after the proposal to close it.

> Schedule UnfencedMessage would lost envelope info 
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-12887
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12887
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>            Reporter: Zili Chen
>            Assignee: Zili Chen
>            Priority: Major
>
> We provide {{runAsync}}, {{callAsync}} and {{scheduleRunAsync}} for 
> {{MainThreadExecutable}}, while providing {{runAsyncWithoutFencing}} and 
> {{callAsyncWithoutFencing}} additionally for {{FencedMainThreadExecutable}}.
> Let's think about a case when we want to schedule a unfenced runnable or any 
> other unfenced message(currently, we don't have such code path but it's 
> semantically valid.). 
> 1. {{FencedAkkaRpcActor}} received an unfenced runnable with delay
> 2. It extracted the runnable from unfenced message and call 
> {{super.handleRpcMessage}}.
> 3. {{AkkaRpcActor}} enveloped the message and schedule it by 
> {{AkkaRpcActor#L410}}.
> However, {{FencedAkkaRpcActor#envelopeSelfMessage}} was called for envelope. 
> Thus the unfenced message now become a fenced message.
> We can anyway implement {{scheduleRunAsyncWithoutFencing}} to schedule 
> unfenced message directly by {{actorsystem.scheduler.scheduleOnce(..., 
> dispatcher)}}, but with current codebase I notice that {{RunAsync}} has a 
> wried {{atTimeNanos}}(i.e., delay) property. Ideally how to schedule a 
> message is shown on what params ScheduleExecutorService called with, at least 
> we cannot extract an unfenced message and envelop it into a fence message and 
> then schedule it, which goes into wrong semantic.
> cc [~till.rohrmann]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to