[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17276965#comment-17276965
 ] 

Yun Tang commented on FLINK-21030:
----------------------------------

I think returning the complete future to checkpoint coordinator to check 
whether the synchronous savepoint is finally completed is okay.

The only thing I confuse is that shall we need such high requirement over 
normal checkpoints. From my understanding, current normal checkpoints could 
tolerate several executions fail to confirm the complete checkpoint.

> Broken job restart for job with disjoint graph
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-21030
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21030
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>    Affects Versions: 1.11.2
>            Reporter: Theo Diefenthal
>            Assignee: Matthias
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.11.4, 1.12.2, 1.13.0
>
>
> Building on top of bugs:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21028
>  and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21029 : 
> I tried to stop a Flink application on YARN via savepoint which didn't 
> succeed due to a possible bug/racecondition in shutdown (Bug 21028). Due to 
> some reason, Flink attempted to restart the pipeline after the failure in 
> shutdown (21029). The bug here:
> As I mentioned: My jobgraph is disjoint and the pipelines are fully isolated. 
> Lets say the original error occured in a single task of pipeline1. Flink then 
> restarted the entire pipeline1, but pipeline2 was shutdown successfully and 
> switched the state to FINISHED.
> My job thus was in kind of an invalid state after the attempt to stopping: 
> One of two pipelines was running, the other was FINISHED. I guess this is 
> kind of a bug in the restarting behavior that only all connected components 
> of a graph are restarted, but the others aren't...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to