[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Iaroslav Zeigerman updated FLINK-21507:
---------------------------------------
    Description: 
When I use multiple custom partitioning operations in a row like this:
{code:java}
stream
  .partitionCustom(<custom_partitioner1>, _.key1)
  .mapWithState(...)
  .partitionCustom(<custom_partitioner2>, _.key2)
  .map(...)
  ....{code}
I see that only last partitioning operation (custom_partitioner2) is reflected 
in the DAG while the 1st one is ignored entirely.

I've also confirmed that the 1st partitioning wasn't applied at runtime from 
application logs.

**UPD**
Seems like the problem is caused by 

 

  was:
When I use multiple custom partitioning operations in a row like this:
{code:java}
stream
  .partitionCustom(<custom_partitioner1>, _.key1)
  .mapWithState(...)
  .partitionCustom(<custom_partitioner2>, _.key2)
  .map(...)
  ....{code}
I see that only last partitioning operation (custom_partitioner2) is reflected 
in the DAG while the 1st one is ignored entirely.

I've also confirmed that the 1st partitioning wasn't applied at runtime from 
application logs.

 


> Reinterpreting stream as keyed breaks the upstream partitioning
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-21507
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21507
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: API / DataStream, API / Scala
>    Affects Versions: 1.11.0
>            Reporter: Iaroslav Zeigerman
>            Priority: Major
>
> When I use multiple custom partitioning operations in a row like this:
> {code:java}
> stream
>   .partitionCustom(<custom_partitioner1>, _.key1)
>   .mapWithState(...)
>   .partitionCustom(<custom_partitioner2>, _.key2)
>   .map(...)
>   ....{code}
> I see that only last partitioning operation (custom_partitioner2) is 
> reflected in the DAG while the 1st one is ignored entirely.
> I've also confirmed that the 1st partitioning wasn't applied at runtime from 
> application logs.
> **UPD**
> Seems like the problem is caused by 
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to