[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17299120#comment-17299120
]
J Y edited comment on FLINK-19955 at 3/10/21, 8:47 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------
related: i'm in the situation where i want to use ParquetProtoWriters found in
flink-parquet 1.12.x, but the rest of our codebase, anticipating possibly
running on the fully-managed aws flink solution, is depending on 1.11.1.
i'm expecting this to work since i am thinking that 1.11 vs 1.12 is only a
minor version bump, and flink-parquet is more of a "terminal" package rather
than a core, internal flink library.
is this assumption correct?
was (Author: jinyius):
related: i'm in the situation where i want to use ParquetProtoWriters found in
flink-parquet 1.12.x, but the rest of our codebase, anticipating on possibly
running on the fully-managed aws flink solution, is depending on 1.11.1.
i'm expecting this to work since i am thinking that 1.11 vs 1.12 is only a
minor version bump, and flink-parquet is more of a "terminal" package rather
than a core, internal flink library.
is this assumption correct?
> Document cross-version compatibility
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-19955
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19955
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation, Runtime / Coordination
> Affects Versions: 1.12.0
> Reporter: Robert Metzger
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.13.0
>
>
> A user rightfully asked on the list, what Flink guarantees cross-minor
> versions:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r29b3600848ff3e2966a83b6bdcd7b3fe2835be62a2cd44ddfcf31881%40%3Cuser.flink.apache.org%3E
> I'd expect such information on this documentation page:
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/ops/upgrading.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
