[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15238719#comment-15238719
 ] 

Yijie Shen commented on FLINK-3738:
-----------------------------------

Hi [~fhueske], your idea make much sense to me.

Besides you have mentioned above, I think it's worthwhile to rethink the 
*validation* of plan generated from our Table API.

Currently, out validation codes are scattered mainly in two places: in table 
API's RelNode construction, and in code generation. Regarding the lifecycle of 
query execution, it's scattered in logical plan generation and physical plan 
generation. Since table API & sql execution share the code generation path, the 
validation here is inappropriate.

Therefore, I think we could possibly extract the validation into a single 
phase, between table API call and RelNode construction, similar to the planning 
procedure of SQL String execution. 

> Refactor TableEnvironment and TranslationContext
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-3738
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3738
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Table API
>            Reporter: Fabian Hueske
>            Assignee: Fabian Hueske
>
> Currently the TableAPI uses a static object called {{TranslationContext}} 
> which holds the Calcite table catalog and a Calcite planner instance. 
> Whenever a {{DataSet}} or {{DataStream}} is converted into a {{Table}} or 
> registered as a {{Table}} on the {{TableEnvironment}}, a new entry is added 
> to the catalog. The first time a {{Table}} is added, a planner instance is 
> created. The planner is used to optimize the query (defined by one or more 
> Table API operations and/or one ore more SQL queries) when a {{Table}} is 
> converted into a {{DataSet}} or {{DataStream}}. Since a planner may only be 
> used to optimize a single program, the choice of a single static object is 
> problematic.
> I propose to refactor the {{TableEnvironment}} to take over the 
> responsibility of holding the catalog and the planner instance. 
> - A {{TableEnvironment}} holds a catalog of registered tables and a single 
> planner instance.
> - A {{TableEnvironment}} will only allow to translate a single {{Table}} 
> (possibly composed of several Table API operations and SQL queries) into a 
> {{DataSet}} or {{DataStream}}. 
> - A {{TableEnvironment}} is bound to an {{ExecutionEnvironment}} or a 
> {{StreamExecutionEnvironment}}. This is necessary to create data source or 
> source functions to read external tables or streams.
> - {{DataSet}} and {{DataStream}} need a reference to a {{TableEnvironment}} 
> to be converted into a {{Table}}. This will prohibit implicit casts as 
> currently supported for the DataSet Scala API.
> - A {{Table}} needs a reference to the {{TableEnvironment}} it is bound to. 
> Only tables from the same {{TableEnvironment}} can be processed together.
> - The {{TranslationContext}} will be completely removed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to