[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Timo Walther closed FLINK-21872.
--------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 1.13.0
       Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in 1.13.0: 619ad4bd0fc522c14952ba2e9c37c3fd0099053b

> Create a utility to create DataStream API's DataType and Schema
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-21872
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21872
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Table SQL / API
>            Reporter: Timo Walther
>            Assignee: Timo Walther
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.13.0
>
>
> FLIP-136 defines the following behavior that should be supported by such a 
> utility:
>  * Since the type system of Table API is more powerful than DataStream API 
> that uses TypeExtraction, it enables replacing GenericTypeInfo with a more 
> meaningful DataType. E.g. for supporting immutable POJOs as StructuredType 
> instead of RawType. Or Lists as ArrayTypes instead of RawTypes.
>  * We will perform verification based on what is available in TypeInformation.
>  * Type coercion between an explicitly specified Schema and DataStream will 
> not happen (e.g. DataStream<Integer> != Schema.column("f", 
> DataTypes.BIGINT())). Because the user specified the desired data type 
> explicitly and expects correctness.
>  * It allows to define a `system_rowtime` attribute for using the 
> StreamRecord's timestamp and existing watermarks.
>  * It allows to reorder fields and thus has similar functionality as the 
> Expression-based API before but with a more consistent API.
>  * Users can place the definition time attributes at arbitrary locations 
> between existing fields.
>  * We can give time attributes a name in the same way as in regular DDL.
>  * By using `{{system_rowtime().as("rowtime")}}` the watermark would be 
> assigned implicitly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to