yittg commented on pull request #15501: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15501#issuecomment-816485868
> I am also not suggesting to implement our own shared watch. It just feels like we are doing some duplicated things that shared informer already supports. One thing we need to implement is the event dispatcher whether we using the informer or not. The `ResourceEventHandler` is not proper for our use case. If we want to provide a watcher for the special case( only care about MODIFIED, and it will always occur as described before ), a dispatcher with the normal watch is ok. it's simple but not another simplified informer. If we use the informer, we can provide a close-to-real watching. It's ok for me to provide a new individual interface, no matter how we achieve it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
