[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17329081#comment-17329081
]
Flink Jira Bot commented on FLINK-3394:
---------------------------------------
This critical issue is unassigned and itself and all of its Sub-Tasks have not
been updated for 7 days. So, it has been labeled "stale-critical". If this
ticket is indeed critical, please either assign yourself or give an update.
Afterwards, please remove the label. In 7 days the issue will be deprioritized.
> Clear up the contract of MutableObjectIterator.next(reuse)
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-3394
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3394
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Runtime / Task
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Gábor Gévay
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: stale-critical
>
> {{MutableObjectIterator.next(reuse)}} has the following contract (according
> to [~StephanEwen]'s comment \[1\]):
> 1. The caller may not hold onto {{reuse}} any more
> 2. The iterator implementor may not hold onto the returned object any more.
> This should be documented in its javadoc (with "WARNING" so that people don't
> overlook it).
> Additionally, since this was a "secret contract" up to now, all the 270
> usages of {{MutableObjectIterator.next(reuse)}} should be checked for
> violations. A few that are suspicious at first glance, are in
> {{CrossDriver}}, {{UnionWithTempOperator}},
> {{MutableHashTable.ProbeIterator.next}},
> {{ReusingBuildFirstHashJoinIterator.callWithNextKey}}. (The violating calls
> in the reduce drivers are being fixed by
> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1626 )
> \[1\]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3291?focusedCommentId=15144654&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15144654
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
