[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15262391#comment-15262391
]
Greg Hogan commented on FLINK-3447:
-----------------------------------
Thoughts on this, [~vkalavri]? Flink algorithms seem to be added, removed, and
moved on a regular basis. Is the goal of Gelly to only keep the best
implementation of each algorithm or present multiple good implementations? With
duplicate implementations the I find the package naming to be better than
prepending some classes with the name of the graph model.
> Package Gelly algorithms by framework
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-3447
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3447
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Gelly
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Greg Hogan
> Assignee: Greg Hogan
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently algorithms in the Gelly library are collected in the
> {{org.apache.flink.graph.library}} package. The gather-sum-apply class names
> are prefixed by "GSA". Gelly contains multiple frameworks as named in
> FLINK-3208.
> Since algorithms can be (and are) duplicated across the multiple frameworks,
> we can move the algorithms into subpackages by the name of the framework.
> - vertex-centric model: {{org.apache.flink.graph.library.pregel}}
> - scatter-gather model: {{org.apache.flink.graph.library.spargel}}
> - gather-sum-apply model: {{org.apache.flink.graph.library.gsa}}
> - native methods: {{org.apache.flink.graph.library.asm}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
