[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-6114:
----------------------------------
    Priority: Minor  (was: Major)

> Type checking fails with generics, even when concrete type of field is not 
> needed
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6114
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6114
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: API / Type Serialization System
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0
>            Reporter: Luke Hutchison
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: auto-deprioritized-major
>
> The Flink type checker does not allow generic types to be used in any field 
> of a tuple when a join is being executed, even if the generic is not in a 
> field that is involved in the join.
> I have a type Tuple3<String, K, Float>, which contains a generic type 
> parameter K. I am joining using .where(0).equalTo(0). The type of field 0 is 
> well-defined as String. However, this gives me the following error:
> {noformat}
> Exception in thread "main" 
> org.apache.flink.api.common.functions.InvalidTypesException: Type of 
> TypeVariable 'K' in 'public static org.apache.flink.api.java.DataSet 
> mypkg.MyClass.method(params)' could not be determined. This is most likely a 
> type erasure problem. The type extraction currently supports types with 
> generic variables only in cases where all variables in the return type can be 
> deduced from the input type(s).
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.api.java.typeutils.TypeExtractor.createSubTypesInfo(TypeExtractor.java:989)
> {noformat}
> The code compiles fine, however -- the static type system is able to 
> correctly resolve the types in the surrounding code.
> Really only the fields that are affected by joins (or groupBy, aggregation 
> etc.) should be checked for concrete types in this way.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to