[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17336834#comment-17336834
 ] 

Flink Jira Bot commented on FLINK-5065:
---------------------------------------

This issue was labeled "stale-major" 7 ago and has not received any updates so 
it is being deprioritized. If this ticket is actually Major, please raise the 
priority and ask a committer to assign you the issue or revive the public 
discussion.


> Resource leaks in case of lost checkpoint messages
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5065
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5065
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Checkpointing
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.3, 1.2.0
>            Reporter: Till Rohrmann
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: stale-major
>
> In case of lost checkpoint messages ({{AbstractCheckpointMessage}}) there 
> won't be a clean up of the contained state handle done. This can happen in 
> case of a JM crash if the TM had just sent a checkpoint message to the JM. 
> Upon recovery, the JM won't notice that there was a checkpoint message which 
> it had to handle.
> One way to mitigate the problem is to let the TM expect a response from the 
> JM and if the JM failed to respond in time, to discard the state handle of 
> the checkpoint message. Moreover, the JM could register in a fault tolerant 
> store that it started a pending checkpoint. The entry should contain enough 
> information (e.g. path for {{FileSystemStateBackend}}) to clean up a pending 
> checkpoint with potentially lost checkpoint messages upon recovery of the JM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to