[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot closed FLINK-8951.
---------------------------------
    Resolution: Auto Closed

This issue was labeled "stale-minor" 7 ago and has not received any updates so 
I have gone ahead and closed it.  If you are still affected by this or would 
like to raise the priority of this ticket please re-open, removing the label 
"auto-closed" and raise the ticket priority accordingly.


> Support OVER windows PARTITION BY (rounded) timestamp
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-8951
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8951
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Table SQL / Legacy Planner
>            Reporter: Fabian Hueske
>            Assignee: TANG Wen-hui
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: auto-closed, stale-assigned
>
> There are a few interesting use cases that can be addressed by queries that 
> follow the following pattern
> {code:sql}
> SELECT sensorId COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY CEIL(rowtime TO HOUR) ORDER BY 
> temp ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED preceding AND CURRENT ROW) FROM sensors
> {code}
> Such queries can be used to compute rolling cascading (tumbling) windows with 
> aggregates that are reset in regular intervals. This can be useful for TOP-K 
> per minute/hour/day queries.
> Right now, such {{OVER}} windows are not supported, because we require that 
> the {{ORDER BY}} clause is defined on a timestamp (time indicator) attribute. 
> In order to support this kind of queries, we would require that the 
> {{PARTITION BY}} clause contains a timestamp (time indicator) attribute or a 
> function that is defined on it and which is monotonicity preserving. Once the 
> optimizer identifies this case, it could translate the query into a special 
> time-partitioned OVER window operator.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to