[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-6109:
----------------------------------
    Labels: auto-unassigned stale-major  (was: auto-unassigned)

I am the [Flink Jira Bot|https://github.com/apache/flink-jira-bot/] and I help 
the community manage its development. I see this issues has been marked as 
Major but is unassigned and neither itself nor its Sub-Tasks have been updated 
for 30 days. I have gone ahead and added a "stale-major" to the issue". If this 
ticket is a Major, please either assign yourself or give an update. Afterwards, 
please remove the label or in 7 days the issue will be deprioritized.


> Add "consumer lag" report metric to FlinkKafkaConsumer
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6109
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6109
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Connectors / Common, Connectors / Kafka
>            Reporter: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: auto-unassigned, stale-major
>
> This is a feature discussed in this ML: 
> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Telling-if-a-job-has-caught-up-with-Kafka-td12261.html.
> As discussed, we can expose two kinds of "consumer lag" metrics for this:
>  - *current consumer lag per partition:* the current difference between the 
> latest offset and the last collected record. This metric is calculated and 
> updated at a configurable interval. This metric basically serves as an 
> indicator of how the consumer is keeping up with the head of partitions. I 
> propose to name this {{currentOffsetLag}}.
>  - *Consumer lag of last checkpoint per partition:* the difference between 
> the latest offset and the offset stored in the checkpoint. This metric is 
> only updated when checkpoints are completed. It serves as an indicator of how 
> much data may need to be replayed in case of a failure. I propose to name 
> this {{lastCheckpointedOffsetLag}}.
> I don't think it is reasonable to define a metric of whether or not a 
> consumer has "caught up" with the HEAD. That would imply a threshold for the 
> offset difference. We should probably leave this "caught up" logic for the 
> user to determine themselves when they query this metric.
> The granularity of the metric is per-FlinkKafkaConsumer, and independent of 
> the consumer group.id used (the offset used to calculate consumer lag is the 
> internal offset state of the FlinkKafkaConsumer, not the consumer group's 
> committed offsets in Kafka).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to